WAM Essentials, Inc. logo

WAM Essentials, Inc.

Systemic Enzyme Therapy ... Allowing You to Live Your Passion!™

 

Clinical study of the efficacy of and tolerance to seaprose S in inflammatory venous disease. Controlled study versus serratio-peptidase

Bracale G, Selvetella L.

Minerva Cardioangiol. 1996 Oct;44(10):515-24.

Divisione di Chirurgia Vascolare, Universita degli Studi di Napoli, Federico II.

Divider

This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of seaprose S and serratio-peptidase in the treatment of venous inflammatory disease. Forty patients entered the study (11 males, 29 females), mean age 54.3 years (range 30-77), mean weight 74.8 kg (range 51-96), with superficial thrombophlebitis. The trial was conducted following a controlled, between patients, randomized experimental design. Seaprose S was administered as 30 mg tablets at a daily dosage of 90 mg (one tab t.i.d.), and serratio-peptidase as 5 mg tablets, at a dose of 30 mg per day (two tabs t.i.d.), both orally, for 14 days. Twenty patients received seaprose S and 20 serratio-peptidase. The findings indicate that seaprose S was more effective and better tolerated than serratio-peptidase. Although the group of patients assigned to seaprose S had considerably more severe initial symptoms, by the end of treatment spontaneous pain was reduced 68.7% from the baseline mean score (from 3.2 to 1.0), as compared with a 63.3% reduction in the serratio-peptidase group (from 3.0 to 1.1). Pain on pressure was reduced 61.1% with seaprose S (from 3.6 to 1.4), compared to 57.6% with the reference treatment (from 3.3 to 1.4). Edema was reduced respectively 75% (from 1.6 to 0.4) and 56.2% (from 1.6 to 0.7); erythema diminished 72.4% (from 2.9 to 0.8) and 58.3% (from 2.4 to 1.0); nighttime cramps were 61.1% less (from 1.8 to 0.7) compared with 52.9% (from 1.7 to 0.8); hemorrhagic suffusion was 53.3% less (from 1.5 to 0.7) compared with 41.7% (from 1.2 to 0.7); cutaneous dystrophy was reduced by 11.1% (from 1.8 to 1.6) and 7.7% (from 1.3 to 1.2). At the end of the treatment with seaprose S efficacy was assessed as good or excellent in 85% of the cases, compared with 65% for serratio-peptidase. Seaprose S caused no adverse reactions. During serratio-peptidase treatment one patient reported diarrhea, requiring temporary dosage reduction and specific treatment. It can thus be confirmed that seaprose S was effective and well tolerated in patients with inflammatory venous diseases.

Publication Types:
• Clinical Trial
• Randomized Controlled Trial

Medical Disclaimer: We believe that the role of nutrition is important to good health, however, this web site is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice. Our goal is to provide you, the customer, with the information necessary for you to make important nutritional and self-help decisions. We strongly suggest that you share any products you decide to use with your health care professional for optimal individual health benefits. Women who are planning on becoming pregnant or who are pregnant should not take any supplements without consulting their physician first. Information and statements on this website regarding dietary supplements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration, and are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, mitigate or prevent any disease or health condition.

 
© Copyright 2004 WAM Essentials, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
None of the material contained herein may be reproduced without the prior written consent of WAM Essentials, Inc.